About this WebSite

About this WebSite

This site was started around the latter half of 1995, just before I came back from my assignment in Japan. Since then it has pretty much grown without any plan, as time and energy allowed. In December of 2013 a WordPress blog was added and over time some of the static content was migraed to blog posts. Since then progress on content migration has slowed to a crawl and the added friction of preparing material for the website has made new posts more-or-less extinct.

In order to remedy this, I am in the process (as of mid-2022) of converting the site back to a static model but one in which the static pages are generated from a collection of text files that will reside on my computer at home. This should make posting new articles and maintaining those that already exist much easier (from my point-of-view, at least). With any luck, I should be able to post more frequently once the bulk of the conversion is done.

The following two questions used to be included in my personal FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) page but I decided they were better suited for this page, being more about the site itself than about me personally:</p>

Both of these links, as well as the FAQ link above, point to legacy pages which do not include the top navigation menu – use your browser’s “Back” button to return to this page. These legacy pages will be converted to the new format as time allows.

There were also a few legacy pages that were fun to put together but really don’t fit into any of the categories of information hosted on this site. One is a blatant stab at webcrawlers and other vermin that attempt to index the web by systematically following every link. This page of keywords used to attract web-crawlers and irritate the CIA has turned out to be a great way to attract readers to my web page – especially after I moved that cute picture of Ally from my favorite places page to the keywords page.

Last (but certainly not least), there are a number of pages that do not necessarily belong to my personal collection but which are, nonetheless, hosted by myself on this or one of my other web sites. Feel free to peruse this information as well.

About the Author

Hello. My name is Joe Larabell. In case it’s not already obvious, you’re looking at a page from my personal blog. This section is basically a rewrite of what I wrote when I first converted everything to Wordpress. The current version has been rewritten for the new static version of the site.

I first published my own static web page around 1995 and since then it’s accumulated a considerable collection of information, most of which is embarassignly out-of-date. I’ve had a number of interesting adventures during my half-century on this planet. I’ve been a member of a number of different religious groups, been married three times, and changed jobs about a dozen times. I’m currently retired, having hit the age limit for retirement in my previous company (age discrimination is legal in Japan, it seems).

Since, at one point, I was receiving over 10,000 spam emails a day, I no longer post my email address. I’ve found a similar issue with contact pages so what I’m currently doing is asking people to message me via my Twitter account “AT JoeLarabell” I don’t spend much time scanning Twitter these days so it may take me a while to read your message.

I’m quite opinionated on a number of topics so if you want to know anything about Thelema, Scientology, Ceremonial Magick, Japan, Buddhism, Electronic Design Automation, Cross-Cultural Marriage, or even just advice on life in general, write me or leave a comment on one of my posts (I use Disqus for comment management).

It’s hard to know what to say in this space that won’t come across as the prosaic equivalent of a “selfie” but on the off-chance someone reading this page is actually interested in who I am and where I’m coming from, I figured I should have something that answers their questions. To that end, I’ll format this more as a “Frequently Asked Questions” (FAQ) page. The answers are a bit out-of-date but at one point in time they were all more-or-less true.

Where have you been… I’ve been looking all over for you?

After graduating from Wayne State University in Detroit, I spent 15 years living in Los Angeles to get away from the snow. I was bitten by the Japan bug a little over two decades ago and decided to try my hand at living abroad. I moved to Tokyo in December of 1993 and lived there for just over two years. In early 1996 I decided to return to California for a much needed rest. This time I landed in the heart of Silicon Valley. My tenure in the San Jose area was also short-lived. Around the end of 1998 I was approached by someone I had met during my previous stay in Japan and, after a bit of soul searching and an offer I couldn't refuse, I decided to give Tokyo a second chance. The second time seems to have stuck... I've been here for over 16 years now and there's no end in sight. I prefer to make myself difficult to find in the flesh but I am not at all difficult to reach in cyber-space. In theory, you should be able to look me up on Google+. I don't have a Facebook page so don't even try looking. I hesitate to publish my email address because I've seen the volumes of spam that resulted from publishing my address openly on the legacy site and it's not a pretty picture. Try the Contact link at the top of the page.

What do you look like?

I pretty much try to avoid publishing private images of myself, my family, or my activities online. There are a few exceptions. You can find a series of "approved" personal images at "The Many Faces of..." on this very site. If you republish anything from this web site that's attributed to me, please try to stick to one of the images on that page (and be sure to honor the copyright license shown at the bottom of every page).

What do you do for a living?

I develop computer software for a major Electronic Design Automation (EDA) company. I've been in software development of one sort or another for nearly 3 decades (except for some of the time in Japan, when I worked in customer support). My specialty is digital logic simulation... although the simulation part is more-or-less a solved problem these days and most of my work is with the tools and applications surrounding the simulator itself. If you don't know about EDA and simulation, the basic idea is to provide a set of tools that IC chip designers can use to verify their designs before building them (because, once you've build an IC chip, it's too late to fix it if you got it wrong). It's a fairly specialized field with only a handful of major players.

Why do you keep your resume online?

Because I can. And because it annoys those who choose to ignore the fact that everyone, ultimately, is available if the situation is right. This is especially true in any sort of high-tech field. Also, it saves me the time and trouble of printing and mailing my resume to headhunters or perspective employers. In fact, the last two times I changed jobs, I didn't need to do anything but email the URL where my resume could be found. It serves as a screening device, too. If a personnel grunt tells me they need a hard-copy resume because their company doen't have internet access, I know that's not any place I would enjoy working. (By the way... in case it's not obvious... my online resume is intentionally out-of-date.)

So you’re available to look at employment opportunities?

Not really. In fact, I turned down an opportunity to interview at Google a couple years ago. Everyone, ultimately, is available and if you're able to double my salary and guarantee a five-year contract, let's talk. But, other than that, I have a job I enjoy (most of the time), working for a boss with whom I get along very well, I'm paid a competitive salary, and I get to work at home. Not only that but, at this point in my career, I'm better off building on my existing reputation rather than trying to establish myself in a new environment. But thanks for asking... For the record, I delete any cold-call emails from recruiters who don't give me some indication that they've read this page. In fact, these days GMail probably deletes them before I even see them. (Thanks, Google ;-).

What is your personal philosophy?

I'll keep this as short as I can. The root of my personal philosophy is simple. It can be summed up in eleven words: "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law". In essence, this is an affirmation of individual freedom. But, while it may seem simple on the surface, in practice it is hardly easy. For one, most people miss that this is not meant to excuse whatever behavior you might wish to display toward others but that it is more of an indication to the person you are addressing that you honor their chosen course through life. You see, nobody can be truly free unless everyone is equally free. This is the basis of most of my action these days. But, like I said, it's hardly easy. Now, those who have already heard the above quote will recognize this philosophy as Thelema. However, everyone is ultimately the product of their experiences, overlaid one upon the other like a collage. While I do subscribe personally to the tenets proposed by Thelema, my personal philosophy is made up of pieces of all of the various practices that I engagned in along the way. Among these are Catholicism, Scientology, Seth, Hermeticism, Magick, Buddhism, and (most recently) Shinto. One of my talents this life seems to be the ability to make complex things seem simple through the use of analogy. I am also able to see the similarities between different systems of belief and I'm not so stuck to any one of them that I can't accept what's useful from other systems. These two talents, in combination with the unique path I happen to have followed, have given me what I think is a unique perspective on the ancient principles of hermeticism. I intend over the next few months (or years, if need be) to write a series of lectures on the subject. I have also been thinking about how Thelema works as a political platform. That's not to say that existing Thelemic groups are not political. On the contrary, there is often more "politics" in the typical Thelemic Order than in society in general. But what I am referring to is the concept of expanding Thelema to be more than a hobby for armchair magicians and anarchists. My first few attempts to stir the political pot never really panned out. I'm still looking for an avenue to apply the theory of Thelema to the practical matter of governing.

That’s all for now. If you have any questions or thoughts that might be interesting to publish, leave a comment below.

Latest Posts

Effortless Magick

It’s funny how, every once in a while, if you listen to the subtle messages unfolding around you on a constant basis, you pick up on a pattern of small bits of information that seem to build into something substantial. That happened to me recently on the general topic of effortlessness. Like many would-be adepts, I have a number of daily practices that I fit into various parts of the day. Sometimes they pay off with feelings of increased awareness or energy but, if I were being totally honest, most of the time they feel like drudge-work… a part of the day that occurs more out of habit than anything else… with the basic idea being one of consistency rather than joy.

Out with the Old...

I was listening to the latest Sam Harris podcast today and ran across an interesting take on something that should be familiar to most Western Ceremonial Magicians. Eric Weinstein was talking about finding meaning in license plate numbers as he drives around (don’t we all do that when we first start on the Path?) and the way he explained it was:

"...it's important to notice what it feels like to discern meaning where there is no meaning... it's important to get in touch with the "as if madness" experience in order to guard against madness; so I'm hoping to suspend my insistence on Truth for periods of time..."

I’m not sure about the connection with madness, per-se… and I’m wondering if that wasn’t just a ploy designed to wrap up the thought before getting interrupted. I realized when he said that that another good reason for discerning meaning where there is none is to prevent intellectual ossification (my term… it didn’t appear in the podcast, as far as I know). The belief that one particular way of looking at things must serve as the filter through which we see everything else from that point forward seems to be common in most philosophies and pretty much all religions. Adherence to a strict theology makes us less able to evaluate contrary ideas on their own merit. On the other hand, by constantly playing fast and loose with one’s synaptic network, so to speak, one might stand a chance of maintaining enough mental flexibility to recognize a true Epiphany when it finally does come.

It’s ironic that avoiding intellectual ossification was one of the main points that Sam was trying to convey just moments earlier… that there’s no logical reason to use one or more points-of-view which happen to have been elaborated thousands of years ago over new points-of-view developed by one’s own reason in the present time. Of course, that’s easier said than done and when most people start on any sort of Philosophical or Spiritual Path, they’re usually not capable of the kind of deep reasoning that would discern the “true meaning” of the Universe at first glance… so we may need to use ancient philosophy and religion as a crutch for a while… in order to bootstrap our thinking to the point where we can reason with some depth on the Universe and our purpose within it. But I expect that we all have to eventually drop the rhetoric and design our own systems based on First Principles.

Misunderstanding Multitasking

I was listening to an interview with the authors of the new book The Distracted Mind on NPR this morning and they touched on a favorite pet peeve of mine that centers on a basic misunderstanding of the term multitasking. According to Wikipedia, the first published use of the term “multitask” appeared in an IBM paper describing the capabilities of the IBM System/360 in 1965. Is is only recently that the term has been used in the common vernacular to refer to the apparent ability of humans to “concentrate” on more than one task at a time.